Tagline: Blogging is a very easy looking activity, , until you actually begin with it…
Most probably even the irregular readers of rubyrailways have noticed a 3 month period of silence during the summer, , which has just ended a few days ago. , In my opinion it is generally not a very good idea to temporarily abandon a blog, , without even announcing a summer holiday or posting a note like “to be continued after an undefined period of blogger’s block” or something. , Why did I allow it happen then?
Well, , there are a handful of reasons for this: summer holidays, , though days at the work, , lot of stuff to do on my PhD but mainly a kind of a blogger’s crisis. , Although all the reasons are very interesting, , I would like to elaborate on the last one a bit.
The first problem stems from the relative success of my previous entries: Tutorials like Install Internet Explorer on Ubuntu Dapper in 3 easy steps, , Data extraction for Web 2.0: Screen scraping in Ruby/Rails or Getting Ruby on Rails up and running on Ubuntu Dapper were quite popular and set a standard which was not easy to top (or at least to maintain) in terms of equally interesting topics. Unfortunately I can pursue Ruby, , Rails and even screen scraping/web extraction only in my spare time which is a scarce resource (it’s kind of hard to work full time, , roll a PhD and blog simultaneously :-)) and therefore I do not bump into an interesting topic just every second day. , However, , this eventually got me into a kind-of an inverse Concorde-effect: If I have waited a week, , then I can wait another to deliver something sexy. , After a month: Now that I have waited a month, , I surely have to come up with something really juicy… , You get the idea.
I believe I am not the only one around with this thinking pattern, , and I am not sure how are others handling this problem, , but I have decided to give up this habit - in the future I would like to blog regularly, , even at the cost that not every post will be a top-notch blockbuster :-).
The second problem is that I am kind of a renaissance guy: I am interested in new technologies, , programming, , science research, , economics, , reading books just about everything, , photography, , traveling, , computer games, , sports… However, , since rubyrailways is my first attempt at blogging, , I am quite unsure how to deal with this amount of information: what should be the ratio of not-necessarily-correlated topics (e.g. , Ruby, , travelling and PhD research). , I am nearly sure though that it is not a good idea to blog about everything, , since then every post will be uninteresting for most of the readers. ,
Yes, , I know that categories were invented to workaround this problem. , However, , in my experience most of the people today are using feed aggregators and/or personal start pages like bloglines, , netvibes or pageflakes, , and hence are facing this problem nevertheless. , Yes, , they could ignore the posts that are not interesting to them, , but after doing so a few times they will potentially ignore your whole blog. So how to find the golden mean?
A possible solution is to have a separate blog for everything: In my case this would mean at least a software development (mainly Ruby/Rails), , general technology, , Linux/Ubuntu, , Science/PhD research and a travelling blog. , Well, , I certainly would not have the time to keep up all of them since I am struggling even with rubyrailways :-)… , I could of course ignore what people think about my blog and just write it to myself, , but that would deprive me from knowing what other people think about the things I am after, , which is a very valuable information for me.
I would be very much interested in your opinion on this topic: How do you solve this ‘feature creep’ on your blog - by maintaining more blogs, , focusing on just one topic and ignoring the others, , or trying to balance somehow?
Please leave me a comment or send me a mail, , I’d really like to hear your opinion…
Similar Posts:online viagra

September 29th, 2006 at 3:41 am
, Just my two cents.
, My opinion is that most important thing is to keep blog interesting. If you want to share something that is interesting for you, , but it doesn’t fit main blog topic, , you still should publish it.
, I think that best audience is that audience that likes what you like. It means less subscribers, , but gaining much more quality over quantity, , if this could be applied to readers (I suppose that it definitely could)
September 29th, 2006 at 4:14 am
, Well, , this sounds quite rational… I think I will try to do as you advise for a month or two and let’s see what will get out of it.
September 29th, 2006 at 4:50 am
, i think simply blog about everything that you’d like to share with the rest of the web. no need to create specific blog for specific topics… after all, , this is about YOU, , not about RoR etc… at least imho…
, and regarding the feed-reader-problem… if i’m not mistaken, , it’s possible to have separate feeds for the separate categories, , so if someone is only interested in the RoR posts, , he can subscribe to your blog’s RoR feed (not sure if it’s by default like this in wordpress or some specific configuration is required)
September 29th, 2006 at 8:38 am
, I’ve found the categories perfectly address separating topic-specific articles from other potential randomness, , and it lowers the barrier to posting (which is rare enough in my own case).
, WordPress (by default) already provides category specific RSS for your feed aggregator users: simply append /feed/ to the category URL, , and you’re done.
, e.g. /category/ruby/feed/
, All that’s left is making that known to your visitors. Some of the WordPress styles include those RSS feed links on the category pages views, , but if not, , you’ll find it simple to add them.
April 29th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
, Wanted to compliment on your site, , it looks really good .
, Hank
November 26th, 2007 at 10:17 am
, cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg
cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg
May 13th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
, 2c8abf7608cb…
, 2c8abf7608cb4e18b3fb…
September 5th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
, Hi webmaster!
August 30th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
, I thought I wasnt going to like this blog but more I read the more I liked it.
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:05 am
, Hi thank you for an perceptive post, , I actually found your blog by mistake while searching on Goole for something else nearly related, , in any case before i ramble on too much i would just like to state how much I enjoyed your post, , I have bookmarked your site and also taken your RSS feed, , Once Again thank you very much for the blog post keep up the good work.